Sunday, September 17, 2017 (Updated July 2021)
In 2013, the parents of two students at a school in Encinitas, California filed a lawsuit against the Encinitas Union School District (EUSD) claiming that yoga is areligious practice that should not be taught in public schools. The parents were concerned that a EUSD health and wellness program (HWP) that included yoga was in violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution. The first trial took place in June 2013, with a final ruling that the EUSD HWP was not religious. The concerned parents appealed this initial ruling, and the case was brought to the California state supreme court. In April 2015, the state appeals court again ruled that the HWP was not religious.
A few weeks after the ruling, researchers from the University of Buffalo, led by Catherine Cook-Cottone, Ph.D., interviewed 32 school personnel who were involved with the lawsuit, including district superintendents, assistants, school principals, classroom teachers, instructors of the EUSD HWP, and University of San Diego researchers who were originally involved in studying the program. In August 2017, the results of their qualitative study were published in the International Journal of Yoga Therapy.
The study described a large variety of opinions and experiences of school personnel who were involved with the lawsuit, so a full description of the findings is beyond the scope of this article. However, we want to highlight a few results for consideration by yoga service providers.
Notably, participants were in agreement that the HWP was not religious, however they expressed compassion and understanding about the parents’ concerns, and support of their right to address their concerns in court.
Also, despite the fact that the Encinitas lawsuit received a lot of media attention, it’s interesting to note that very few children actually opted out of the EUSD HWP. According to one health and wellness instructor quoted in the study, only 8 out of around 700 students opted out of the program, primarily citing religious reasons. In other words, the majority of parents appeared to be supportive of the HWP.
One topic that came up repeatedly in the study was that there may have been several factors related to the initial implementation of the HWP that sparked parental concerns. Yoga was initially introduced in 2011 to one EUSD school by one instructor. However, the program grew rapidly based on funding received from the Sonima Foundation (formerly Jois Foundation, now known as Pure Edge Inc.). This funding allowed the district to develop a formal HWP and implement it district-wide during the 2012-2013 school year.
Some study participants noted that when yoga was initially introduced at EUSD, it included cultural artifacts, such as Sanskrit language, mandalas, Hindu stories, prayer mudra / hand gesture (i.e. bringing hands together at one’s heart), and a poster that outlined the eight limbs of yoga from Patanjali’s yoga sutras. They shared that while the intention of the HWP was never meant to be religious, these cultural artifacts may very well have been what sparked initial parental concerns. The EUSD responded quickly to these concerns by removing all cultural artifacts from the school environment, clearly explaining to the program instructors that these artifacts were not appropriate, and giving parents the opportunity to observe the yoga classes, but the “damage” had already been done.
The results of this study on the Encinitas School Yoga Lawsuit highlight several key takeaways for those of us interested in implementing yoga in school settings:
1) Inform and educate.
Take the time to make sure all stakeholders, including school personnel, parents, program instructors, and students are fully informed and aware of the secular nature of the program. While yoga instructors and some classroom teachers might be excited about the prospect of implementing school-based yoga, and want to do it quickly, not all stakeholders will feel the same way. Read this 2012 article our founder, Lisa Flynn, wrote in response to the Encinitas controversy, which includes tips about informing all stakeholders, including holding information sessions for parents and teachers, as well as sending informational letters and regular updates to parents.
2) Keep it school-appropriate and inclusive.
Yes, we believe yoga offers a secular method to enhance social-emotional skills and positive youth development, but we need to be extremely thoughtful about how we are approaching schools and/or delivering programming in schools While Sanskrit language, mandalas, and prayer mudras might be so common in some people’s lives that they aren’t perceived as anything out of the ordinary, we need to stay mindful of the fact that it is practically guaranteed that school community members, including parents, will have experiences that are different. Despite innocent intentions, including cultural artifacts can actually prevent some students from accessing yoga, which is the opposite of our intentions. Respect, a focus on inclusion, compassion and non-attachment are essential.
3) Be transparent.
Another key takeaway is the importance of transparency about the origins and funding of a school-based yoga program (if it involves outside funding). While most programs are not funded by external sources, the EUSD HWP received funding from, and was a program developed by, the Sonima Foundation, which was formerly known as the Jois Foundation. According to the Jois Yoga website, Jois Yoga “is an institute set up to impart the traditional Ashtanga philosophy and practice developed and taught by Sri K. Pattabhi Jois in Mysore, India since the early 20th century.” Note that the Jois Foundation is not alone in this – other school-based yoga programs, such as Kripalu Yoga in the Schools, are also supported by organizations that have ties to traditional teachers and practices from India. These types of funding situations are the minority, however it is important to be aware of and transparent about the origins of the program being taught. No matter how far removed the school-based versions of these yoga programs are from the traditional origins of these organizations, any parent who does a bit of online digging has the potential to become concerned if these ties are not made transparent from the beginning. In other words, these types of collaborations need to be made clear to parents and school personnel upfront. The most crucial piece here is to provide information explaining that the school-based versions of these yoga programs have been developed in secular ways that are not associated with any particular religious practices or beliefs.
4) Be mindful.
It’s important that we recognize that controversies and lawsuits such as the Encinitas case can and will be sensationalized by the media. One small error in judgment while teaching yoga in a single class in a single school can be cause for that program to be completely shut down as we’ve seen take place in various instances around the country in recent years. When the media creates a stir, well-founded or not, it creates fear which can, and has, negatively affected the current and/or planned implementation of other quality, beneficial yoga and mindfulness programming in other schools/districts. We have experienced this negative phenomenon first-hand by having had a contract for districtwide implementation rescinded before the program even started. And it wasn’t related to our program at all. It happened due to fear caused by media attention generated when a single parent in a single school took offense to a classroom teacher using the term, “Namaste,” with her students. These are seemingly small incidents that can lead to tremendously negative consequences, not just on individual schools and programs, but on the yoga and mindfulness in schools movement as a whole.
5) Keep to the science.
Finally, be clear about the reasons why you want to implement a school-based yoga program in the first place. Rather than being a stealthy way to spread religious doctrine, school-based yoga really does help kids. There are several scientific reviews and rationale papers that can be offered to district personnel and parents that explain the stress managing and self-regulating effects of yoga and mindfulness practices. For a comprehensive reference list of peer-reviewed research on yoga and mindfulness for youth, and specifically in schools, check out the Yoga 4 Classrooms supporting research page.
School personnel at EUSD did the best they could under difficult circumstances, and now it’s up to us to learn from their experiences. What can we learn? In a nutshell: full transparency is necessary, from all angles, before a yoga program is implemented in a school. Go slow, read others’ stories of school yoga and mindfulness integration and understand the best practices for what and how you are teaching so that you don’t end up with issues later on. Implementing school-based mindfulness and yoga in a thoughtful way will help ensure that students and schools across this country and others have access to programming that can support social and emotional learning, health and wellness, and a positive school climate.
A final note:
It’s important to note that Yoga 4 Classrooms was designed with school appropriateness and cultural inclusion in mind. Our five program pillars, which include inclusivity and accessibility, continue to serve as the foundation upon which Y4C supports school communities. Check out these related articles:
- Yoga in Schools Promotes Spiritual Development and It Has Nothing to Do With Religion
- Yoga in Schools is Not a Religious Practice – Elephant Journal features our article on the issue
Cook-Cottone, C., Lemish, E., & Guyker, W. (2017). Interpretive phenomenological analysis of a lawsuit contending that school-based yoga is religion: A study of school personnel. International Journal of Yoga Therapy. Advance online publication. doi: 10.17761/IJYT2017_Research_Cook_Cottone